Frequently Asked Questions
Frequently Asked Questions
A1: Schwab’s SCHE typically carries a far lower expense ratio (around 0.07%) compared with EEM, which sits around 0.68%–0.69% per year. This cost gap compounds over time and can have a meaningful impact on long-term returns.
A2: SCHE tracks the FTSE Emerging Markets Index, while EEM tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets Index. Differences in country weights and sector tilts between these indices can lead to divergent performance, especially in certain economic or geopolitical environments. Over short periods, performance gaps may appear, but over long horizons, cost differences and tracking accuracy often dominate choices.
A3: For a cost-efficient core EM exposure intended to be held for many years, schwab emerging markets ishares is a strong option due to its low expense ratio and straightforward structure. If you want higher liquidity for periodic rebalancing or tactical adjustments, EEM can be a valuable complement.
A4: Both funds deliver dividend income, typically in the 1.5%–3% range depending on market conditions. Tax treatment is similar in most taxable accounts, but foreign withholding taxes and fund-level tax considerations can vary. Always compare after-tax yields in your own tax situation.
A5: Some investors use both to diversify tracking differences and liquidity profiles. Start with a core position in schwab emerging markets ishares for cost efficiency, then consider a smaller position in EEM to access its liquidity and benchmark stability. Rebalance gradually to maintain your intended risk exposure.
Discussion