Overview: A watershed for affordable housing and loans
In a decisive step that could reshape Michigan’s housing landscape, Governor Gretchen Whitmer signed a key single-stair reform into law, unlocking a path for developers to build smaller, more efficient apartment buildings. The change allows multifamily projects up to six stories to proceed with a single interior exit stair, a notable shift from the traditional, two-stair requirement for taller structures.
The measure is not just about floor plans; it has immediate implications for the loans and financing that fuel construction. By reducing the upfront cost of core safety infrastructure, lenders say the change could lower financing risk and expand options for mid-rise developments, particularly in markets facing supply shortages.
What the reform actually does
The new law relaxes the International Building Code baseline that has governed residential towers taller than three stories. Michigan now permits a six-story building to operate with one interior exit stair, provided other safety provisions remain intact. For developers, that translates to cost savings on stairwell construction, egress systems, and related life-safety measures, potentially improving the economics of smaller, mid-rise projects.
Advocates frame the reform as a critical step toward broader housing-availability goals. If financing conditions tighten again or if project timelines shorten due to labor or material bottlenecks, the streamlined design could help keep projects on track without compromising safety or regulatory standards.
Economic and lending implications
The change lands at a moment when lenders and developers are navigating a complex loan-market environment. While construction debt terms have fluctuated with interest-rate cycles, many lenders say policy modernization—paired with market demand for denser urban and near-urban living—can improve project feasibility for mid-rise buildings.
Analysts expect lenders to weigh the reform against other cost drivers, including land prices, labor availability, and material costs. If the six-story, single-stair approach remains compliant with fire-safety codes and local amendments, construction lenders may see a reduction in capex per unit and a tighter path to budget adherence for mid-rise projects.
On the borrower side, homeowners-turned-investors and developers may gain access to more streamlined loan structures for eligible projects. With housing demand strong in many Michigan municipalities, the policy tweak could help unlock financing for a segment of multifamily development that had been financially marginal under the previous two-stair threshold.
Political and advocacy landscape
The reform comes amid a broader push by housing advocates to advance what they term a “Housing Readiness” package. The measures under consideration aim to accelerate development, reduce regulatory friction, and expand the supply of affordable rental units. The immediate passage of single-stair reform could provide the momentum needed to push a wider package through the Legislature this year.
Lauren Strickland, executive director of Abundant Housing Michigan, framed the development as a catalyst for broader policy progress. "This could propel the momentum we need to change the laws to make housing more affordable," she said, highlighting the potential for a trickle-down effect on how lenders assess risk and price loans for mid-rise projects.
Who opposed and who supported the shift
Support for the reform has been strongest among developers, city planners, and housing advocates who say the change aligns Michigan with other states that have adopted similar thresholds. Colorado, Texas, and Montana, among others, have already moved ahead with reduced-stair requirements for taller buildings, signaling a broader national trend toward higher-density, modestly scaled housing.

Opposition, as in many jurisdictions considering egress changes, has come from some firefighting and safety officials who contend that more egress options enhance occupant safety and provide firefighters with clearer access during emergencies. While advocates argue modern fire-safety analysis can support single-stair configurations in well-designed buildings, local fire authorities may demand supplemental safeguards and inspection regimes before approving permits for some projects.
Next steps for Michigan’s housing agenda
With the single-stair reform law now in effect, lawmakers and advocates are turning their attention to the broader Housing Readiness package. Lawmakers have signaled they will consider companion bills that address zoning, financing, and building-permit processes—areas that could shape the feasibility of a wave of mid-rise developments across urban and near-urban Michigan.
Municipalities are already evaluating how the rule interacts with local safety codes, fire marshal guidance, and school-district planning in areas where new mid-rise projects could shift demographics and traffic patterns. Developers are watching local zoning boards closely, hoping for a predictable permitting cadence that aligns with revised state standards.
At a glance: key data and milestones
- Policy change: Allows up to six-story residential buildings with a single interior exit stair.
- Previous standard: Taller than three stories typically required two interior egress stairs.
- Broader goal: Part of a potential Housing Readiness package under legislative review.
- National context: States such as COLORADO, TEXAS, and MONTANA have adopted similar single-stair thresholds; others are studying the approach.
- Public safety debate: Fire officials nationwide remain wary of single-stair configurations, citing potential evacuation challenges and firefighting access concerns.
Bottom line
The signing of Michigan’s single-stair reform marks a pragmatic shift in the state’s housing policy and its lending landscape. For developers, it could mean more cost-efficient paths to mid-rise housing; for lenders, a rebalanced risk profile and the promise of clearer project timelines. As michigan’s whitmer steps signs toward broader policy changes, market participants will be watching how the Housing Readiness package evolves and whether local authorities embrace the reform with consistent permitting and safety oversight.
Observers say michigan’s whitmer steps signs toward a broader rethinking of housing policy in the state, potentially shaping investment decisions and loan structures for years to come.
Discussion